• Register
Description

(non-official) Fix for AMD GPU's. Reduced file size from 145 Megs down to 74 Megs

Preview
Refracted Reality AMD-fix and reduced filesize (non-official)
Post comment Comments
skdursh
skdursh - - 474 comments

Bro, you're seething harder than a Doomworld jannie. It's just a WAD. The authors chose to use GZDoom because it has some advanced features the other available engines do not. I didn't think it was particularly that great of a mapset myself, but you're going full schizo just because it didn't work well for you and it doesn't work on a different engine. Literally who cares, there are thousands upon thousands of other WADs out there, take a couple of deep breaths and then go play one of those instead.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

True LOL We can only change things if we make noise though. I will not just sit here while they think it's normal standard procedure from now on to make mods that only run in Nvidia GPU's. And giving awards to a mod like that. Expose these *************, embarass them publicly. That's how we create change. I could just sit here like a coward. But no, let me waste my life away writing PARAGRAPHS LMAOOOOOOO

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

What I'm trying to say is: mod creators, please TRY (at least TRY god dammit) to keep your mods compatible with gzdoom version 2.4.0 (2017) That way you won't alienate an entire portion of the crowd that loves Doom mods based on them having the "latest and greatest" hardware or whatever. Version 2.4.0 will still work on older computers, most of the features are there.
Wanna know how do I know this is true?
Because when I was still in my older laptop, back in 2020, I modified this same mod in order to make it load up in LZdoom and older versions of gzdoom for testing purposes.
How I achieved that?
Simply opening the file in Slade and making slight modifications to the syntax of a few lines of codes (based on gzdoom error messages... I needed to do this some 4 or 5 times, took me 15 minutes, not a big deal)
After that, I tested and played the maps, and they worked normally (scripts and whatnot)
So this is proof that, indeed, there is NO features in newer versions of gzdoom that weren't already implemented in this older 2017 version (2.4.0)
Some other people also mention still using gzdoom version 3.2.5 (or is it 3.2.4 I can't remember) to this day because of similar reasons. If you think I'm crazy, go ask them why they do it.
Summary:
I could be a bit more concise with my writings, but so far no one has come back with valid arguments, just emotional responses and denial.
Until you have valid technical arguments to back up your claims, don't come argue with me, otherwise you will be put to shame publicly.
Emotional responses in cognitive dissonance will not cut it.
And yes, it does feel glorious to win everytime.
You see... it's not that difficult to defeat me: just do your homework. Simple.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
jokerrider
jokerrider - - 298 comments

"What I'm trying to say is: mod creators, please TRY (at least TRY god dammit) to keep your mods compatible with gzdoom version 2.4.0 (2017) That way you won't alienate an entire portion of the crowd that loves Doom mods based on them having the "latest and greatest" hardware or whatever. Version 2.4.0 will still work on older computers, most of the features are there."

This is the thing I don't get with the "modern" WADs nowadays, the reason why I prefer the older Doom mods without the bloated effects, etc. is that you can play them regardless if your CPU speed/hardware came from 2010 but looks like it's the norm nowadays to put too much special effects just to say your WAD is special. I don't mind a few special effects here and there in a WAD (going off-topic a bit, quite frankly, I'm amazed with map makers who only use stock Doom/Heretic/Hexen assets to create good WADs - Whispers of Satan comes to mind) but it's funny to me to run a specific WAD for an almost 30-year old game with the latest computer hardware.

And as for the people running doomworld/zdoom forums and their sycophants, let them be. They have no power over moddb anyway.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

Exactly.
You guys can use my page here (it allows for anonymous comments here, after all) or my Youtube channel shown in the video to write down what were the most stupid things you ever seen happening in regards to gzdoom, or something bad that the gzdoom "team" done to others.
We have to start documenting these things down, because they feel they are untouchable when they remove other people's accounts and they write aggressive replies only to delete them later on, to appear as if they done nothing. On Zdoom forums it's even worse, since I've seen older threads having screenshots with useful technical information being removed (information that is going to be forever lost now)
We did not start the aggression, they started it. So now they pay the consequences.
I will provide a platform for you to speak.
While they hide in the dark corner like cochroaches that they are.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
jokerrider
jokerrider - - 298 comments

Speaking of Doom forums that are harassing mod developers, "Call of Doom: Black Warfare" comes to mind. The poor mod developer of that project was harassed by ZDoomers just because the mod developer wanted to do things his way despite getting suggestions from the ZDoomers themselves. Having played the mod itself, I can say it's good. It's frankly disgusting and it's one of the things that made me want to leave the entire Doom forums for good.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

wow, that was a pretty disgraceful interaction, sadly... I just visited the thread page. Seems to me like they kept aggravating the guy and then the forum "admin" just came by to scold him.
Do you know if there were more messages in that forum page? Maybe some are already deleted. I printed a PDF of it just in case they delete more. I recommend you making a copy too. They try to erase what they did all the time there.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

A few months ago I just tested one of these "modern weapons in doom" mods, there was a learning curve at first of course but it played fine, better than I expected honestly. The official video for that Call of Doom video looks fun as hell LOL (if anything too many particle effects that can slow down your PC, but gameplay is fine)

Reply Good karma+1 vote
jokerrider
jokerrider - - 298 comments

Not sure if the messages were deleted, it probably ended up in their "halls of the damned" thread. I'm glad that the mod maker didn't compromise his work just because a couple of loudmouths were harassing him.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

Mod creators:
If you need help with certain functions or scripts to keep them compatible with gzdoom version 2.4.0 or older, please ask for help. I can provide help. There are ways to make this work.
A good example of all this is PirateDoom (2013)
Do your mod needs to do something different that hasn't already been done there? Otherwise, that Doom mod there should be used as a reference guide for scripts and code examples.
DO NOT rely on the "official" Zdoom guides, they are super convoluted, badly written and they often lead to performance issues. Ask for help, reach out. Don't let ******** destroy your entire mod.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

I don't remember what it was that I've seen being recommended in one of the "official" Zdoom wiki pages for creating new mods.
I should have taken screenshots of these things for me to remember them later.
They were recommending an over-engineered and overly complex way of creating assets in the game, when there are much simpler ways of creating custom items or monsters in zdoom.
Rule of thumb is: never follow "official" guides, always use other mods as a template for features that you want and adapt them.
If you are creating your mod from scratch, typing code from zero, then not only you are wasting a lot of time for yourself, but you are creating a bunch of problems in regards to performance and making a portion of the crowd unable to play your mod later on. Follow "official" guides if you want your mod to become forgotten in time, because no one is going to be able to play it.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

Video footage that prooves that Refracted Reality is able to load in older versions of gzdoom after a few small changes in syntax in the code.
Which goes to proove what I said: there are no features in the gzdoom engine that didn't already exist back in 2017.
What they've done is they simply changed the syntax of some of the functions and added arguments in some of them...
For example: being able to call different sprites in a single line of code, like this, AAAAAABBCCDEFGH, used for animations. Or the ability to call sprites with more than 4 characters in their filename... cosmetic changes, not functional changes.
--
What the footage shows is this:
left side (bad... lights turned down, less definition/sharpness on textures, particularly bad in areas where you need to see things in the distance, having to squint your eyes to see details, causes eye strain...) left side: lzdoom which was the only gzdoom version that worked in older GPU that did not have OpenGL 4.0 drivers, versions of gzdoom after late 2017 did not load on that hardware anymore
--
right side (good, better... more brightness to the image, more color saturation, vivid colors like the original Doom games, special attention to how textures look more sharp and you can notice details more easily even in a crappy 480p footage)
right side: older versions of gzdoom such as 1.9.1 or 2.4.0
Not only changes in the code, but also makes the mod look better too
--
Refracted Reality is shown at about 8:18

Reply Good karma+1 vote
BlacklightVoid
BlacklightVoid - - 28 comments

Hereticnic, thank you very much! Sorry, those who justify the Creators of the WAD, but I have to agree with him. I happened to touch RR and played with EVP and other mods. As soon as I finished one of the cards, an error flew out. I'm also an old-school player, but why can't I play with modifications? There's a vanilla arsenal and monsters, and they're already getting bored.

I thought that this mod is not compatible with WAD, but in fact the Creators themselves are to blame, who did not optimize for AMD GPU. But you know what's funny? I have Nvidia GTX 1050 and even with it I get an error! And downloaded this version, then everything works fine! FPS in any case will not add, but you can now play with mods! The creators, damn it!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Hereticnic Author
Hereticnic - - 229 comments

wow... so it's even worse than I thought... thanks for the report, we have to document these kinds of things to expose these pieces of trash

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Guest
Guest - - 690,252 comments

Agreed,Hereticnic-nothing makes me MORE mad than a mod only for a certain
sourceport(heartland).

i can relate to that sort of thing.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
sastel
sastel - - 107 comments

I wholeheartedly agree regarding the newer versions of GZDoom being unfriendly towards the older wads. The people who package the newer versions just make a few modifications here and there and they just release it like it's something new or whatever.

And the less said about the totalitarian admins of ZDoom, the better.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Guest
Guest - - 690,252 comments

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: